> It's no problem, and, as I said, even more correct in the presence > of constraints. If the use is legitimate, perhaps the documentation should reflect this. > The real question is: what are you trying to achieve with this > strange use of findall? I'm just reviewing the code! But I think the objective (which comes up quite often) is simply that we know there is at most one solution, we want whatever is done inside the goal to be undone, but we also want to keep the solution. It could be that "not not" coupled with the use of a shelf would do the job here, but perhaps the coder found findall more convenient. josh Josh Singer Software Developer, Parc Technologies Limited Tel. +44 (0)207 261 4067 josh.singer@parc-technologies.com http://www.parc-technologies.com This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) -its contents are the property of Parc Technologies Limited (or its licensors) and are confidential. Please do not copy, review, use (except for the intended purposes), disclose or distribute the e-mail or its contents (or allow anyone else to do so) without our prior permission. Parc Technologies Limited does not guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and amended nor that it is virus-free. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. Any opinions expressed in this e-mail message are those of the author and not necessarily Parc Technologies Limited.Received on Tue May 27 09:47:05 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed 16 Nov 2005 06:08:22 PM GMT GMT