- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Thorsten Winterer <thorsten_winterer_at_...126...>

Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:37:01 +0100

Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:37:01 +0100

Hi Bogdan, can you give more information on the ECLiPSe version that you use? I tested your program with 6.0#127, and I got identical solutions for both variants: Found a solution with cost 63.600314464631339__63.600314464631467 Found a solution with cost 59.30430001273087__59.304300012730991 Found a solution with cost 57.2013985843003__57.201398584300421 Found a solution with cost 49.919935897394716__49.919935897394772 Found a solution with cost 47.885279575251481__47.885279575251538 Found a solution with cost 45.254833995939016__45.254833995939073 Found a solution with cost 43.312815655415406__43.312815655415456 Found a solution with cost 40.951190458886522__40.951190458886572 Found a solution with cost 37.841775856848983__37.841775856849033 Found a solution with cost 34.9714169000914__34.971416900091448 Found a solution with cost 32.419130154894638__32.419130154894681 Found a solution with cost 29.189039038652826__29.189039038652858 Found a solution with cost 24.637369989509825__24.637369989509853 Found no solution with cost 0.0 .. 23.637369989509853 * Bin Configurations: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1] [0, 0, 0, 1, 0] [0, 0, 1, 0, 0] [0, 1, 0, 0, 0] [0, 0, 1, 0, 0] [1, 0, 0, 0, 0] * Bin Loads: [42, 23, 27, 27, 24] * Weigth Configurations: [14, 33, 24, 49] :: [0, 0, 1, 0] [41, 49, 9, 27] :: [0, 0, 0, 1] [6, 49, 10, 12] :: [0, 0, 0, 1] [41, 9, 23, 45] :: [0, 0, 1, 0] [49, 19, 15, 51] :: [0, 0, 1, 0] [47, 12, 42, 47] :: [0, 0, 1, 0] Found a solution with cost 61.644140029689716__61.644140029689837 Found a solution with cost 57.2013985843003__57.201398584300421 Found a solution with cost 49.919935897394716__49.919935897394772 Found a solution with cost 45.254833995939016__45.254833995939073 Found a solution with cost 43.312815655415406__43.312815655415456 Found a solution with cost 37.841775856848983__37.841775856849033 Found a solution with cost 34.9714169000914__34.971416900091448 Found a solution with cost 32.419130154894638__32.419130154894681 Found a solution with cost 24.637369989509825__24.637369989509853 Found no solution with cost 0.0 .. 23.637369989509853 * Bin Configurations: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1] [0, 0, 0, 1, 0] [0, 0, 1, 0, 0] [0, 1, 0, 0, 0] [0, 0, 1, 0, 0] [1, 0, 0, 0, 0] * Bin Loads: [42, 23, 27, 27, 24] * Weigth Configurations: [14, 33, 24, 49] :: [0, 0, 1, 0] [41, 49, 9, 27] :: [0, 0, 0, 1] [6, 49, 10, 12] :: [0, 0, 0, 1] [41, 9, 23, 45] :: [0, 0, 1, 0] [49, 19, 15, 51] :: [0, 0, 1, 0] [47, 12, 42, 47] :: [0, 0, 1, 0] Results: 24.6373699895098__24.6373699895099 24.6373699895098__24.6373699895099 Cheers, Thorsten Am 16.11.2011 10:56, schrieb Bogdan Tanasa: > > Hi guys, > > I have a small version of the bin covering problem which I try to solve. > > I have to versions of it, the second one uses reified constraints. > > It happens that the second one give different results compared with > the first implementation which does not uses reified constraints. > > Can you please tell me what is wrong_ > > Bogdan. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > > > _______________________________________________ > ECLiPSe-CLP-Users mailing list > ECLiPSe-CLP-Users_at_lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipse-clp-usersReceived on Wed Nov 16 2011 - 10:37:10 CET

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Aug 20 2024 - 18:13:21 CEST
*